Republican presidential candidate, former President Donald Trump arrives at a marketing campaign occasion on the Hyatt Hotel on December 13, 2023 in Coralville, Iowa.
Scott Olson | Getty Images News | Getty Images
The judge presiding over the high-stakes civil enterprise fraud trial of former President Donald Trump harshly questioned the credibility of a key expert protection witness, suggesting his testimony was influenced by his almost $900,000 fee.
The expert, New York University Accounting Professor Eli Bartov, advised CNBC he was “shocked” by the judge’s remarks and denied that his cost performed a job in his evaluation.
Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron slammed Bartov in a Monday night ruling denying the defendants’ newest request for a directed verdict in the $250 million case.
“Bartov is a tenured professor, however all that his testimony proves is that for one million or so {dollars}, some specialists will say no matter you need them to say,” Engoron wrote in the three-page ruling.
It is widespread for specialists to be paid by the celebration asking for his or her involvement in a lawsuit, however opposing events — or in this case, a judge — can use that compensation to query the expert’s credibility.
“The most obvious flaw” in the defendants’ bid to scrap the case for lack of proof, Engoron wrote, is their assumption that their specialists’ testimony “is true and correct, or no less than that the Court, because the trier of reality, will settle for it as true and correct.”
The judge wrote that Bartov’s “overarching level” was that the monetary statements on the coronary heart of the case “have been correct in each respect.”
But Engoron famous that he had already discovered that these monetary data “contained quite a few apparent errors” earlier than the trial even started. “By doggedly making an attempt to justify each misstatement, Professor Bartov misplaced all credibility,” Engoron wrote.
Bartov mentioned that Engoron’s description of his testimony was a “full mischaracterization.”
He mentioned his testimony acknowledged that the monetary statements contained errors, such because the valuation of Trump’s triplex condominium in Manhattan’s Trump Tower.
But he discovered these errors to be inadvertent, somewhat than fraudulent, he mentioned.
“I’m shocked that the judge mischaracterized my testimony in this manner,” Bartov mentioned.
James’ workplace mentioned Trump’s monetary data reported the Manhattan triplex as being 30,000 sq. ft, almost thrice its precise dimension. The condominium in 2015 was valued at $327 million, greater than triple the worth of the costliest condominium ever offered in New York City, in accordance with the AG’s workplace.
That ruling discovered Trump and his co-defendants responsible for fraudulently misstating the values of actual property properties and different key belongings, the central declare of the civil lawsuit introduced by New York Attorney General Letitia James.
Engoron in Monday’s resolution famous that the defendants have made no less than 5 makes an attempt for a directed verdict in the case, all of which have been denied.
Trump, in a prolonged assertion on Truth Social, blasted Engoron’s newest ruling. He repeated numerous claims that he has ceaselessly put ahead in protection of the monetary statements, together with claiming that his Palm Beach resort house Mar-a-Lago is price as much as $1.8 billion.
Trump additionally defended Bartov towards Engoron’s criticisms.
“Judge Engoron challenges the extremely revered Expert Witness for receiving charges, which is customary and accepted follow for Expert Witnesses,” Trump wrote. “The ignorant Judge didn’t even attempt to hearken to the Expert witness. This is a good insult to a person of impeccable character and {qualifications}.”
Bartov additionally defended himself towards Engoron’s insinuation that he was swayed by cash.
The professor mentioned in his trial testimony, and in a deposition over the summer time, that he was being compensated at a charge of $1,350 an hour for his involvement with the protection.
He mentioned on the stand that he logged 650 billable hours, which provides as much as $877,500 in compensation.
He additionally famous that Save America, the political motion committee backing Trump’s 2024 presidential marketing campaign, had paid some of these payments, whereas the Trump Organization paid the remaining.
Bartov advised CNBC that he had charged the identical hourly charge in different circumstances, including that he was “very environment friendly” along with his time in this case as a result of he had labored with out the help of a consulting agency.
Bartov maintained that “the fee performed no function” in his analysis.
The ten-and-a-half week trial was held to find out damages and resolve James’ different claims of wrongdoing towards Trump, his grownup sons Donald Trump, Jr. and Eric Trump, the Trump Organization and its high executives.
James seeks $250 million in damages and desires to completely bar Trump and his sons from operating one other New York enterprise.
The events are set to ship closing arguments on Jan. 11.